Licio Gelli said that without Berlusconi's Italy "would be in chaos."
Why now is not in chaos?
By chance I'm living in a peaceful democratic country where everyone's rights are protected in equal way? A country where parliamentarians and top officials of state do not have conflicts of interest and have never been investigated?
A country in which the indices of development are improving?
A country without social conflicts? A country where the political class talks to find the right path to development? A country that points on the young? About their future? On the future of the country?
Really, I apologize, but I had not noticed. And then Licio Gelli
Veltroni said "should disappear."
An intelligent man and sailed as Licio Gelli knows that words have weight. Why use the word "disappear?".
If you do not estimate the work of a politician is said that should "resign", "job change", "engage in another." In that sense "disappear"? And if
Veltroni should "disappear" because it "makes no promises that can not hold, then Berlusconi should be the prototype of the invisible man.
I think public figures should really use words with more tact, because if used in this way could be perceived as real threats.
Monica Mazzoleni
0 comments:
Post a Comment